New Documentary Refutes Global Warming

There is a new Documentary out that claims that the global warming hysteria is the only thing man made in the climate change debate.

You can see a link to the British report at foxnews.com

I have to assume, then, that even if the global warming theories, or hysteria, leads to improved air quality, more recycling, and a greater awareness of human activity, that there is no documentation and no evidence whatsoever that the climate is changing and the average temperature is rising?

What does disagreement about global warming and climate change mean to you?

Well it doesn’t surprise me that there are people that don’t believe in global warming. In all honesty I don’t see how you can refute aspects of global warming. I will have to check this out.

I agree with Tater. I wouldn’t trust a word about the environment from those who try to dispute it.

I am extremely environmentally friendly in all of my habits but I’m actually one of those people who believes that Global Warming MAY be less of a problem than we are being told, or that Global Warming is being caused by natural environmental changes… HOWEVER, there is no convincing proof for me either way, so I say why not err on the side of caution??? It’s kind of like when we are warned about certain things that cause cancer, yet a LOT of people don’t get cancer from them… I still avoid those carcenogens because to me it is just not worth the risk even though I know that there is a chance that it may not give me cancer. Global warming is just too big of a deal to mess with so why risk it?

I am sure there are scaremongers on both sides…

But regardless of whether it is as serious a problem as some are making out (or not) learning to waste less of our natural resources can only be a good thing for the planet, and for the human race.

I totally agree that erring on the side of caution is just the best course of action. It is better to be safe in sorry when you are talking about the place that you live.

All I had to see was “fox news” and I knew it was a phony piece of claptrap. These regressives haven’t a care for our world, they just have to be an ignorant bunch of contrarians, probably making a pile of money in the process.

All I had to see was “fox news” and I knew it was a phony piece of claptrap. These regressives haven’t a care for our world, they just have to be an ignorant bunch of contrarians, probably making a pile of money in the process.

Agreed! I quit associating Fox with the word “News” the day that George Bush was “elected”.

Denis

Our ability to realize we are capable of climate manipulation, is an achievement. This newly evolving capability should be carefully contemplated. Varioius results and intents can design the world we want around our desires. Historically rotation rate and distance/angle from the sun was related to temp variations ,now with atmospheric gaseous contemplation we can see new results coming potentially possible. The important thing is to “model” as if as a teacher, the technology that we envision, that should be, as a part of our desire for a living planet. I felt the intense light in New Zealand from the hole in the ozone layer over head. Knowing the intolerance of plants to UV, I’m headiing for the shade.

Regardless of the cause, the climate is changing.

I think it is time to stop whining about proofs and agreement, and start working on moving folks away fro coastlines and taking other measures to adjust how humans live to compensate for the inevitable rise in ocean levels and greater weather extremes.

I went down to Katrina rescue. Its easy to say what to do if its not you moving. There should be a prohibition on rebuilding in some areas, and all efforts should go to support relocation, but its got to be a step ahead for the individual to choose to go tru the effort. Incentives , bail outs etc.. ask the fed banking system and Bush. The other would be to focus on renewable energy employment for the displaced as a priority placingthe new industry in places for their employment. Castor beans, a great southern crop used in waste land reclamation can be made into supreme bio-d without crossing the food hurdle conflict associated with most biofuels. Solar panels, another option. etc…;)

More often than not, I believe we aren’t given the real story because things are probably much worse than our government, and big business, would like us to know.

I’m new and by no means have I “earned” the long standing people’s respect on this forum yet, however, I’m going to throw my 0.02 in.

Both my wife and I are fairly into the research and development of a greener earth… however, when the gov’ts start screaming global warming, what else are you going to do? Are you actually going to sit and take the gov’t word for it? I don’t think so, the gov’t can’t tie their own shoes let alone get something right about the environment! (case and point: the economic problems) Look through the research already accumulated over time the trends of the global temperature and up and down, the trend of “global warming” has been happening for centuries, this is nothing new. There have been many global “warmings” and also global “coolings”, so I don’t buy this “end of days”, “turn or burn” mentality when it comes to this global warming. It all just doesn’t add up. If you want to know the research let me know, I’ll try to dig it up.

Aaaaand… that’s my 0.02.

That guy,

Jr.