You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Home › Forums › Alternative Energy › Nuclear & Oil Energy › Nuclear and the Presidential Race 08
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
|
chris1203 June 17, 2009 at 3:44 pm |
I hadn’t heard anything about this before the election and, now that Obama is President, I haven’t heard anything about it after the election. |
|
much-ado-about-greenie June 23, 2009 at 5:07 pm |
i guess you guess haven’t heard of Gen 4 reactors which take used uranium and recycle it in light water reactors. Beyond this when the re-used uranium it is at such a low level of radioactivity it loses all of its radioactive agents within a 100 years. |
|
walker935 May 15, 2010 at 3:12 am |
We in the UK are also now looking at Nuclear energy again. It is cheap, clean and efficient. Gone are the days of scary radiation leaks etc. The technology has moved on a long way. Fossil fuels will not last forever. |
|
walker935 May 27, 2010 at 1:28 am |
I had not heard where he said the he would look into it. But in all honesty I think that nuclear energy should be looked at but not to the detriment of looking at other options. Sadly I think that is what will happen in the end. |
|
dotieied July 26, 2010 at 11:32 am |
I am my own heroine |
|
stavy July 26, 2010 at 8:15 pm |
So how do we all feel about nuclear power 2 years on? Is it moving forward in the US? Over here things have gone a little quiet on the subject, but plans for building new reactors have been approved. THink it’s now a case of not wanting to spend the money right now, while our new governemnt tightens the public belt… |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.